Get a free account audit
Every account we take over has the same instinct baked in somewhere: split the campaign. Split by match type, split by ASIN, split by placement. It’s usually offered as a default best practice. It isn’t one — it’s a decision with a real cost, and most of the time that cost gets ignored.
What a split actually resets
A campaign’s history is the reason it performs. Amazon’s algorithm has learned which search terms convert, which placements are worth a higher bid, what time of day and day of week the account does best. Split a campaign and that learning doesn’t transfer. The new campaign starts cold — no conversion history, no placement data, nothing to bid confidently against. For two to four weeks, sometimes longer, performance dips while the algorithm relearns what the old campaign already knew.
That’s the trade sellers rarely price in. “More granular control” sounds like a pure upside. It isn’t free.
When the split is worth it
A few situations genuinely call for it:
In each case, the split solves a problem the current structure is actually causing.
When to leave it alone
Most of the time, the answer is no:
The short rule
Before splitting, ask what specific decision the split lets you make that you can’t make today. If there’s a real answer — reporting you need, budget being starved, intent being blended — it’s worth the reset. If the answer is “it would just feel cleaner,” leave it alone and let the campaign keep the history it’s already earned.